El Cajon Gun Exchange Fighting for California's gun owner's
Home Page Shop On-line Gun Safes Legislation Shipping and Returns Terms and Conditions About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Map
Visa MasterCard Discover American Express

Guns and Safes

California's Handgun License Law

California's Handgun License Law
by Ron Godwin, General Manager

12/10/02, Re-edited 11/1/15

Multiple phone conversations with CA-DOJ personnel
Penal Code Section 12071(b)
DOJ Information Bulletin 2002-03-FD dated 11/22/2002.
DOJ Information Bulletin 2002-05-FD dated 11/22/2002.
Handgun Safety Certificate Manual, Nov 2002
NRA Sacramento Office

It was called the Basic Firearm Safety Certificate (BFSC) AKA the California handgun license, (NRA assumed the self appointed role of lead negotiator). It was supposed to be good forever, only applied to handguns and Honorably Discharged vets were exempt.

Webster's New College Dictionary defines license as 1. a) Official or legal permission to do or own a specified thing. b) proof of permission granted, as in the form of a document a driver's license. The same dictionary defines a certificate as 1. A document testifying to truth or accuracy. 2. A document issued to a person completing a course of study not leading to a diploma. The current Firearm Safety Cerificate (FSC) is permission to buy a handgun. It won't surprise me if at some future date it will be required to own a handgun. We will continue to refer to the old Basic Firearms Safety Certificate (BFSC), the old Handgun Safety Certificate (HSC), and the current Firearm Safety Certificate (FSC) as licenses. I'm guessing the NRA and the anti-gun Democrats that wrote the law will continue to call it a certificate.

The difference is in the legal implications. The State of California has now figured out how to license a Constitutionally guaranteed right - the 2nd Amendment. Further, while the NRA may argue that they negotiated out some of the more pernicious provisions, they must also admit that their "negotiation" left anti-gun legislators with the foundation and vehicle to add future restrictions. It is unreasonable to assume that future impediments to the private ownership of firearms in California will not be added - and indeed they already have!

So, after a time had passed, the Democrats changed the BFSC into the Handgun Safety Certificate (HSC), AKA the revised California handgun license, and Honorably Discharged vets were no longer exempt, it cost $25 instead of $5, and it was only good for 5 years.

NOTE: Back when this mess started, the Democrats were calling this a "Handgun License" law. The change to "certificate" allowed our CA NRA lobbyist to claim to dealers and their membership that they had "defeated" the Handgun License and "forced" the Democrat anti-gun legislators to stick to a "Certificate" instead.
The Dems were fine with this request from the NRA spin doctors - they don't care what you call it as long as they get what they want. This was a small price to pay for NRA acquiescence.
The NRA should have taken a dictionary to the negotiations. What we got is a LICENSE!
Not the old BFSC nor the old HSC nor the current FSC are certificates; they are all licenses; you pay a fee, have to pass a test, and must have the "paper document" in hand, or have proof that you are specifically exempt, to be able to buy a handgun. Best response to this self-serving NRA exercise of semantics and, in my opinion, unnecessary compromise, is to call Gun Owners of California at (916) 967-4970 and sign up with a zero compromise organization.

Now, today, the Democrats have once again overhauled this so-called certificate - it is now the Firearm Safety Certificate (FSC) and does the same thing as the BFSC and HSC before it except that it has been expanded to apply to all firearms; rifles, shotguns, handguns, even stripped recievers! You still must take and pass a test, pay a $25 fee; it is valid for 5 years after which it must be renewed. Don't forget! When this tripe was first sold to us by the Dems and the NRA, the BFSC was supposed to be just one test, the fee was $20, and it was supposed to be valid indefinitely.

NOTE: Many more unreasonable impediments to handgun ownership have been added since the original BFSC law and you can read about them at length in the California Penal Code. Compromising with the left is never enough, they always come back for more.
If you are into pain keep reading - otherwise please note that we do everything we legally can to make this as easy a process as we can.

As stated the FSC took effect Jan 1, 2015, costs $25 ($15 to DOJ and $10 Instructor fee), be valid for 5 years, and requires you to pass a test. The test will be administered by interested gun dealers who must be qualified as CA-DOJ Firearms Instructors. In addition to having an FSC, prospective handgun buyers must also provide proof of residency in the State of California. At present this means that the dealer must retain photocopies of one of the following: utility bills or residential lease from within the last 90 days or a property deed, or military Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders. At least one problem with this is that a spouse whose name does not appear on these papers is prevented from buying a handgun.

Once the prospective firearm buyer gets through the FSC and pays the $25 fee, provides the residence documentation if buying a handgun, and goes through the 10 day wait, the delivery process kicks in. The buyer must have an approved by California Firearm Safety Device (FSD, gun safe, or lock box. This can take several forms, depending on what is or is not approved for the firearm in question. There are locking devices (locks/trigger/cable), lock boxes and lockers, and gun safes. The buyer must have the original receipt for locking devices that shows it was purchased within 30 days (the federal 2005 Child Safety Act requires within the 10 days prior to pickup of a handgun), and that identifies the specific device by brand and model. Ditto for CA approved lock boxes that are single firearm containers. The same receipt is required for CA approved lockers designed for multiple handguns but the receipt can be older than 30 days - again the federal 2005 Child Safety Act requires within the 10 days prior to pickup of a handgun. Older HOMAKS and Stack-On lockers that were not California approved may not be used. Gun safes that are UL Residential Security Containers (RSC) or that meet a specific technical description require a receipt or you may sign an affidavit under penalty of perjury. Safes and lockers need not be present at time of delivery but an affidavit must be filled out and again, signed under penalty of perjury. Locking devices and locks must be present at time of delivery, CA approved and approved for the specific firearm being delivered.

NOTE: The federal 2005 Child Safety Act effectively outlaws the use of a CA approved gun locker or gun safe unless the handgun gun buyer actually acquired it within 10 days of the handgun delivery date. This law does not affect long guns. Considering that this really asinine law does not apply to long guns, it appears that the Democrats who wrote it believe that children can only be injured by handguns and are impervious to bullets fired from long guns. We at the El Cajon Gun Exchange disagree and strongly encourage the use of gun safes as the best means to separate children from all firearms

All firearm buyers must correctly perform a safe handling demonstration in the presence of a CA-DOJ certified instructor. Both the firearms dealer and the recipient of the handgun are required to sign an affidavit, which the dealer is required to retain as proof of compliance. Persons who are exempt from the FSC requirement are also exempt from the safe handling requirement with the exception of CA DOJ Firearms instructors who are exempt but have to perform their own safe handling demo.

I almost forgot, we also have to collect your thumbprint on the Dealer Record of Sale (DROS).

Now, the part everyone has been waiting for, the exemptions. Generally - consigned handguns being returned to owner, active duty U.S. Military, Active reserve components of the U.S. Military, honorably retired (is there another type of retired?) U.S. Military, active/retired CA and Federal Peace Officer, Level 1,2, or 3 Reserve Peace Officer, Carry Concealed Weapon (CCW) permit holder (Who can get one?), and several other less likely exemptions - feel free to call for details.


NRA Led Negotiations Result In A CA Handgun License

The Dems wanted a Handgun License. They wanted a full set of fingerprints from handgun owners, a written test, a shooting test, a safe handling demonstration, registration of all handguns, a larger fee, and an expiration date on the license. They got most of what they wanted!

What the Democrats Wanted
What the NRA Negotiated
What CA Gun Owners Won or Lost

Democrat Legislative Proposal The Compromise What we lost
Full set of fingerprints on handgun buyers Gun Lobby Compromises Right thumb print on Dealer Record of Sale (DROS) onlyCriminals are no longer the only ones who get fingerprinted. A full set can easily be written in later. What's next? Mug shots?
Written Test Gun Lobby Loses Another written test with up to a 4 year prison sentence! for dealers who cheat. The legislature acts as if it is a chronic problem when we've never heard of even one instance! We believe that the Legislature is just inventing/looking for reasons to jail gun dealers. One employee can put a gun dealer out of business!
A Shooting Test Gun Lobby Wins Why did the Dems agree? Because the HSC law can easily add this requirement later. Only dealers with range access would be able to deliver a handgun.
A Safe Handling Demonstration Gun Lobby Loses Forces everybody that's not HSC exempt, experienced shooter or not, to perform a poorly written and confusing safe handling demonstration before they can take possession of their handgun. By the way, it takes on average 15-20 minutes of time and creates an additional administrative burden for gun dealers, resulting in a higher cost of handguns to you.
A 5 year expiration date Gun Lobby Loses The Basic Firearm Safety Certificate which the HSC replaced, was good indefinitely. The HSC expires after 5 years.
Increased fee to $25 Gun Lobby Loses The BFSC which never expired and was available after an almost identical 30 question test cost $20. As of 2005 the HSC cost $25 and expires in 5 years. But wait! There's more! The $5 increase goes to DOJ and they do less work for it - we the dealers have to maintain the records for them! Wouldn't we all like to get paid more for doing less? (A BFSC issued in DEC 02 was no good in JAN 03 - no slack for gun owners!)
Registration of all the handguns you own Gun Lobby Compromises Only register the handgun being purchased. Why did the Dems agree? Because the law can easily add this requirement later.
State Qualified DOJ instructors required to administer the HSC system Gun Lobby Loses Gun dealers must find an "Entity Recognized by DOJ as Providing Comparable Handgun Safety Training ..." to qualify their staff as CA DOJ certified handgun instructors. We at the El Cajon Gun Exchange have qualified at our own expense to train others and to date have provided training to many of our competitors, on request, at no charge. Your 2nd Am. rights are more important than our profits.
Fewer exemptions Gun Lobby Loses We lost Honorably Discharged Military, Hunter Safety Certificate, CA Hunting License, and more. They didn't even grandfather BFSC holders who already took and passed almost the same test!
It will be called a "Handgun License" Gun Lobby Wins It will be called a "Safety Certificate". Gun owners still lose. It cost $25, you take a test to get it, you can't buy a handgun without it, it expires in 5 years... sounds like a license to me! We now have a Handgun License in California!


One last thing- Call your legislator!
Tell them it's the repeating Criminal, and not the repeating Firearm!